Saturday, June 11, 2016

THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN WORKERS ON PRODUCTIVITY : A STUDY ON DIRECT IMPACT, INDIRECT IMPACT AND INITIATIVES


THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN WORKERS ON PRODUCTIVITY : A STUDY ON DIRECT IMPACT, INDIRECT IMPACT AND INITIATIVES

Dashathri Arunandy

International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

dasha_23@hotmail.com

                                          

ABSTRACT

This paper pursues to explore the direct and indirect impacts of foreign workers on productivity. Direct impact influences the economy and productivity. The indirect impact has an effect on the political, social and cultural aspect. Initiatives by Malaysia government and practices from other countries’ will be able to help curb the foreign worker issues. Literature reviews have identified various methodologies and studies adopted for the purpose of the research. Largely the literature reviews looks into direct impact as it is crucial to the nation’s well-being. The indirect impact is also studied as it is linked to the productivity and economy. The Social Exchange Theory is utilized as the predominant theory to harmonize the study on locals and foreign workers. This paper will provide and insight of the issues we are facing and the ways we can curb it.

Keywords  : Foreign workers, productivity, direct impact, indirect impact


1.0 INTRODUCTION

Malaysians and foreign workers have a kind of love-hate relationship. For decades, Malaysia has been counting on foreign workers in various industries such as construction, manufacturing, agriculture, services and many more (Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Bachan Singh, Wan Zulkifli Wan Yusof, Aminah Md Yusof and Norzamzila Mustafa, 2011). Today Malaysia is swamped with foreign workers. According to the statistics from the Ministry of Homes Affairs, as of 2015 the total foreign workers existing in Malaysia is 2,135,035. Malaysia has always known for its three main ethnicities namely Malay, Chinese and Indian. However, the number of foreign workers have outnumbered the Indian ethnicity which has a total population of 2.06 million (Vital Statistics Malaysia, Department of Statistics). Having said that, it is clear that foreign workers have swamped Malaysia.

            The question here is whether is this good or bad for Malaysia? Recently, Malaysia had gone through dilemma in addressing the foreign workers matter. There was controversy over the recent announcement by government to bring in 1.5 million foreign workers specifically the Bangladeshis. It caused turmoil within the employers and employees as many Malaysians were not happy with the announcement dues to existing populations of foreign workers. Shortly after the announcement was made the government announced a freeze of foreign workers and yet it upset the employers (The Star, 2016). Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zahid Hamid urged all employers to employ local workers instead. He also mentioned that over influx of foreign workers may cause Malaysia to be like Dubai whereby foreign workers will be more than total local population.

            The World Bank 2015 indicated that Malaysia has the fourth largest number of migrants and the seventh highest ratio of migrants to total population in East Asia Pacific. The report also indicated that the Malaysian economy continues to expand, albeit at a slower pace. Growth is projected to be 4.7% in 2015, easing to 4.5% in 2016 and 2017. The existence of foreign workers has also left an impact on the unemployment rate in Malaysia (Ramesh Kumar Moona Haji Mohamed, Charles Ramendran SPR, Peter Yacob, 2012). That statement can be supported with the recent unemployment rate in Malaysia which has been increasing past two years from 2.9% in 2014 to 3.1% in 2015 (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2016).

            According to the Bank Negara 2015 Annual Report, demand for low-value production and low-skilled workers remained high last year, compared to 2.07 million workers in 2014. The report said agriculture and construction sectors registered the highest dependence on such foreign labour. Malay Contractors Association (PKMM) president Datuk Mokhtar Samad said that The construction industry is very dependent on the participation of foreign workers of about 93 per cent (Borneo Post, 2016). According to the Master Builders Association Malaysia (2014), the country’s most important infrastructure projects already use more steel and pre-cast structures, only requiring foreign workers due to the lack of sufficient local talent. The argument over the need of foreign workers will be an ongoing matter.  Although the presence of foreign workers has positive impact on Malaysia economy, it is undeniable that it has caused negative impact on social, economic and political aspect (The World Bank, EASHS, 2013). The Federation of Malaysia Manufacturers (2016), objected the government’s initial proposal of bringing in 1.5million Bangladeshis because it will cause not only security and health problems but may also lead to political conflict.

            Although several studies attempt to examine issues relating to foreign labour in Malaysia, no serious effort has been made to assess the impact of foreign labour on Malaysian economic growth (Rahmah Ismail and Ferayuliani Yuliyusman, 2014). The purpose of this study is identifying the direct and indirect impact of foreign workers on productivity. The direct impact looks into the economic aspect while the indirect impact looks into social, cultural and political aspects respectively. Prior studies have focused either on direct or indirect impact rather than combining both to look at foreign workers issue in a bigger perspective. This study intent to give an overall picture of both direct and indirect impact of foreign workers. Indirect impact affects the society and ultimately that could affect the productivity. A view of other countries’ practices on handling foreign workers issues will be highlighted to share ways Malaysia could possibly implement other than the ones recommended.

            This study will answer the questions of what is the direct impact of foreign workers on productivity and the indirect impacts of foreign workers on society. The study will also propose some of the practices in other countries used to minimize the foreign workers issue apart from recommendations of how Malaysia can deal with this issue as well. In the next session, the elements of direct and indirect impact are discussed by also addressing the theoretical and practical implications. Followed by the discussion and lastly, the future research directions and conclusion will be discussed.

2.0 Foreign workers in Malaysia; Is there a need?

2.1 11th Malaysia Plan (2016-2020)

In the 11th Malaysia Plan report, the economic agenda outlined is expected to create 1.5 million jobs by 2020, with targeted improvements in labour productivity and reduced dependency on low-skilled foreign workers, both of which are a result of the continuous shift from labour-intensive to knowledge- and innovation-based economic activities. The image below clearly shows that one of the points to reduce is the ease of hiring low skilled foreign workers. The government is aware that the reduction of foreign workers will have a positive impact on the productivity hence the reason it is included in the strategy canvas.


 
 
 
 
 
Source : 11th Malaysia Plan

            One of the thrusts from the 11th Malaysia plan in regards to creating safer living environment for thriving communities; has one of the strategy as tightening regulations and strengthening enforcement to stem crime. This includes initiatives to strengthen legislation, increase the use of crime prevention measures, improve the management of foreign workers, and stem cross-border crime. The other strategy mentioned is the management of foreign workers will be improved by enhancing the role of one-stop center and through greater collaboration between the Immigration Department of Malaysia and local authorities to ensure effective enforcement.

            In the summary of focus areas in the 11th Malaysia Plan, the focus is in improving labour market efficiency to accelerate economic growth by improving management of foreign workers – reducing the nation’s reliance on low-skilled foreign workers and streamlining recruitment as well as immigration processes. The focus is to cap proportion of foreign workers at 15% of total workforce in 2020.

2.2 The significant of productivity

A country’s productivity will say a lot about the stability and well-being of the nation. The Malaysia Productivity Corporation (MPC) is the government arm in measuring the competitiveness and productivity of Malaysia. According the MPC Productivity report 2013/2014, in 2014, Malaysia’s labour productivity as measured by real added value per employee improved by 3.5% at RM61,708 from RM59,622 in 2013. Meanwhile, labour productivity as measured by real added value per hour worked improved to RM28.55 in 2014 from RM27.59 in 2013. The growth in productivity was a contributing factor to the higher growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at 6.0%. The higher GDP was also due to improvements in labour efficiency during the year. Employment grew by 2.4%, which was slower than the 3.8% recorded in 2013 (Figure 1.1). For the period of 2011-2014, Malaysia’s labour productivity registered growth of 2.1%. Malaysia’s labour productivity is targeted to grow at an average annual rate of 3.7% towards becoming a high-income economy by 2020.

            The report also indicated that in 2014, Malaysia’s Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) increased slightly to 67.5% from 67% in 2013. However, Malaysia’s employment mismatch between vacancies and job-seekers remained high but showed a decreasing trend. Although productivity and competitiveness have increased respectively past two years, yet there is evidence showing the mismatch between employment and vacancies. With the existence of vacancies yet we welcome foreign workers and they secure employment regardless or skilled or un-skilled. There is a gap between the productivity and competitiveness if local employment is not taken up.  In the 11th Malaysia Plan, it is stated that despite efforts to improve productivity, Malaysia continues to lag behind many high-income economies. For example, Malaysia’s labour productivity level was 32% that of the United States’ and 56% that of South Korea’s in 2013. Although MPC numbers look good, yet Malaysia needs to boost up. 

2.3 Foreign workers in Malaysia

Foreign worker is a person who is not a citizen working in another country temporarily. Historically, during the British colonialization, the government allowed many immigrants to come in for plantation, mining, construction and others. Since then, foreign workers had an eye for Malaysia as the employment choice. Foreigners working in Malaysia are divided into two major categories, the unskilled/semiskilled and the expatriate groups. The number of legal unskilled/semi-skilled foreign workers fluctuates over the years in response to the economic situation and policy measures formulated and implemented (Azizah Kasim, 2005).

         According to the 2015 statistics, the highest number of foreign workers are from Indonesia which is almost 40% from the total population of 2,135,035. The Nepalese are second highest about 24%, Bangladeshis about 14% and the balance from countries like Thailand, India, Pakistan and Philippines. In terms of employment, foreign workers are largely involved in the construction industry amounting to 35% followed by agriculture and manufacturing about 22% the rest are from service industry (Ministry of Home Affairs, 2015).

            The admission of foreign workers into Malaysia is generally using two ways: legal admission through registered foreign workers agencies under Malaysian Immigration Department and illegal admission through unregistered illegal agencies. According to International Labour Organisation (ILO), Malaysia has critical admission of illegal immigrations among ASEAN countries (Mohd Na’eim Ajis, Mohamad Nasir Saludin, Azman Ismail, Otto F. von Feigenblatt, Md. Shukri Shuib and Mohamad Faisol Keling, 2010).

2.4 The Dilemma – What other countries are facing?

Foreign workers is a very known universal term. Job opportunities are growing like mushrooms and with the help of technology, one can move from one place to another be it country to country. As we are rapidly moving towards industrialization and globalization, survival is the keyword. However, sometimes people lose their selves in that transformation and transition. Focus and priorities change and all people see do is competing to be the best. This is when migrants take advantage of the situation to easily grab the opportunity. Until comes a time when realization kicks in and the need to prioritize citizens becomes a matter to deal with. If we look from a wide angle of perspective of the foreign workers issue, it is known that Malaysia is not the only country facing the foreign workers issues.

            Singapore’s Today Newspaper (2015), published a full report of Singapore’s 2015 general election, whereby the government made a statement- “Singapore has ‘no choice’ but to curb foreign worker growth”. The pas government party lost its seat as the Singaporeans felt it was too lenient towards foreign workers. The new government part mentioned that zero foreign manpower growth will hurt local small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which account for 70 per cent of the workforce here. Therefore step taken to curb this issue has to be done slowly. According to the report from the Prime Minister’s office, in 2015 the number foreign workers increased about 26,000 from 2011 which had 80,000 of them. The Finance Ministry also reported that in 2014, Singapore faced deflation and consumer price index fell by 0.4% due to issues dealing with foreign workers.

            The Middle East country like Dubai is also facing issues with managing foreign workers. In 2015 it was reported in the local newspaper, several hundred south Asian migrant workers have held a rare protest in the heart of Dubai demanding higher wages for their work on the Fountain Views development, a project by the Dubai-based Emaar Properties to build high-end apartments. Millions of South Asian workers provide the manpower to build high-rises, shopping malls, roads and other mega-construction projects throughout the region. Most come to the Gulf in search of more money to send back to relatives. Human Rights Watch estimates there are more than five million low-paid migrant workers in the Emirates alone.   

            The Migration Policy Institute (2013) reported that the UAE had the fifth-largest international migrant stock in the world with 7.8 million migrants (out of a total population of 9.2 million), according to United Nations (UN) estimates. According to Andrzej Kapiszewski (2006), the GCC countries populations have increased by double from 1975 to 2006 with the influx of foreign workers. Andrzej also mentioned that large number of foreigners residing in these countries will bring new social and cultural challenges of consequences difficult to estimate, especially as the naturalization of many foreigners will take place. Asians will continue to dominate the foreign workforce at the expense of the non-Gulf Arab labor.

2.5 Theoretical Implications

From a theoretical standpoint, the Social Exchange theory is used as the main supporting theory because it emphasizes on behavior, connection between employer-employee and work commitment. According to Social Exchange Theory, human interactions can be seen as transactions wherein individuals exchange resources in the hope of a certain benefit (Abdallah M Elamin Hayfaa A. Tlaiss, 2015). Social Exchange Theory, it was also expected that local and foreign workers show differences in work related behavior, and that the relationship between the micro-organizational behavior concepts and commitment and intention to quit was moderated by workers background (Boudewijn van Straaten, 2011). A social exchange relationship rests on the norm of reciprocity. An exchange starts with one party giving a benefit to another. If the recipient reciprocates, and consequently a series of beneficial exchanges occurs, feelings of mutual obligation between the parties are created (Wajda Wikhamn and Angela T. Hall, J.D., 2012).

            According to a study conducted by Mohd Safri Saiman and Salmie Jemon (2014), Maslow’s theory of hierarch of needs, emphasizes security aspect as one of the basic needs of human beings. Therefore, to ensure individual can contribute productively in the labour market, this basic attribute of security needs to be fulfilled first. As such local workers are worried about the security of the nation with the presence of foreign workers.

            The overarching theory for the purpose of this study will be the Social Exchange theory and supported by the Maslow’s theory of hierarchy. Both the theories have significant effect on the study as it intersects in terms of behavior and need.

2.6 Practical Implications

From the practical standpoint, the need to reduce the presence of foreign workers is mainly because Malaysia has been hit with various economic, social, political and cultural issues. Therefore, there is a need to dig into this matter deeply. Ultimately, these issues will be a reason for Malaysian to seek job elsewhere and we will lose out local talents.

            The nation never neglects the locals. However, the supply and demand  sometimes don't match. The jobs available although low skilled can be taken up by locals who possess the minimum requirement. It is natural for citizens to demand rather than foreign workers to demand. The mix and match between job opportunities and local workforce are not getting along well and this has caused employers to lure in foreign workers. Employers are only concerned about their cost and getting the job done. So they will go for foreign workers to achieve their motivation. The impact of this situation is not seen by them. There are many aspects to look at and it is important to see it in a bigger and wider angle. The holistic approach to this matter is crucial to be a well-developed nation. 

            This study will provide a view on the direct and indirect impact of foreign workers on productivity and how Malaysia can curb this issue based on government initiatives and other countries’ practices. The aim to is to reduce the reliance on the foreign workers as Malaysia do have enough local workers. It’s how the government and employers can tap on that local talents and strategize to prioritize them before the foreign workers. This study is not denying the fact that to certain extent foreign workers are needed but it’s about how we manage it. It’s also crucial to have a workforce that is emotionally, socially and politically stable to achieve the nation’s development and towards Vision 2020.

2.7 Direct Impact

The direct impact of foreign workers on economy is the critical part to look into. Economy and productivity do not work independently but hand in hand. The major contribution towards the nation’s productivity and competitiveness largely depend on the economic situation and then on it influences the foreign direct investment in Malaysia.

             Malaysian Trade Union Congress (2015), Borhan Sareya, Kasim Mansur and Roslinah Mahmud (2015) and Mohd Na’eim Ajis, Mohamad Faisol Keling, Zaheruddin Othman and Md. Shukri Shu’ib (2014), agreed that immigrants have negative impacts on the wages of the least educated Malaysians, which represent 14 per cent of the total labour force, and whose wages decline by 0.74 per cent in 2015. Increase in immigration will reduce the wages for only unskilled local workers. It also noted that the overall fiscal impact of immigrant workers on the country is small and the fiscal burden is mostly borne by undocumented people. Undocumented people represent a higher fiscal burden as they do not pay a levy, are often uninsured and raise costs associated with their health care and detention. Due to a non-strict regulations, there are illegal foreign workers which do not have proper documentation but works for Malaysian companies. According to World Bank report 2015, there are likely 1 million undocumented foreign workers in Malaysia. As such, there is no levy paid to the government to bring them in. Immigration is not only losing on the levy but also not able to monitor and track these illegal foreign workers who are taking away the Ringgit.  In Singapore, a large majority of these foreign workers are employed in lower skilled occupations, earning below median wages and hence contributing to the reduction in wage share (Tat and Toh, 2014). It has not only brought about the fall in share of national wages in total income but also increased disparity of income among the resident labour force.

            Prior studies done in the 1990’s in the context of foreign workers in Malaysia have found that the ratio of foreign worker to total labours had increased even back then. Meanwhile, the wage rate of local workers had shown down ward trend due to the presence foreign workers influx. The studies provide the indication that the influx of foreign workers to Malaysia had brought unfavorable condition to job opportunities and wage rate of local workers. The influx of foreign workers had caused the job opportunities and wage rate for local workers to decrease.

            According to Evelyn S. Devadason (2009) in terms of employment, if foreign migrants comprise mainly unskilled workers, it is likely that foreign workers have substitution effects on the domestic unskilled and in wage terms, the greater utilization of cheap foreign labour is deemed to have suppressed the upward pressure of real wages of the unskilled category. In the past, foreign workers used to be paid lesser than Malaysians. However, when the Minimum Wage Policy was implement, the government standardized the salary between the locals and foreign workers. It still wasn’t a happy decision for the locals to be paid the same as foreign workers. Therefore, they become choosy to do certain jobs and those jobs go to foreign workers.      

            In the past decade, studies have shown that foreign workers’ interest were mainly in earning money in Malaysia and opening a business in Malaysia illegally. As such, no tax to be paid and the revenue generated does not contribute to the Malaysian economy. In a survey conducted by Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz (2001), it was proven that Bangladeshi workers are in Malaysia to finance their family in their home country by lengthening their stay in Malaysia and giving back the money to the country. Although the earning capacity is small, But then, in the long haul, it may damage the country’s economy especially from aspects of currency exchange and country’s balance of payments (BOP) when reduction in currency value occurs, and then soon it will affect the country’s reserve (Mohd Na’eim Ajis, Mohamad Faisol Keling, Zaheruddin Othman and Md. Shukri Shu’ib, 2014).

            Literatures have indicated that the direct impact on economy and productivity are mainly due to the issues in wages, levy, tax and outflow of Ringgit. It’s an impact tot the performance of the nation to have face shortage of local workforce that is due to unhappiness in the wage system and having a large number of foreign workers who are invisible and do not contribute to the levy, tax but enjoys the ringgit and scents. Malaysia economy cannot afford to deal with this as we have a vision to look forward to in 2020. The current ringgit value is dropping internationally and this adds up to the miserable situation. If left unattended, a wide range or gap will occur within our society and bring about conflict of interest.

2.8 Indirect Impact

2.8.1 Social, Political and Cultural Impact

Economy is not the only aspect affected with the inflow of foreign workers. According to the Ministry of Home Affairs Malaysia (2014), 9496 criminal cases in Malaysia in 2014 was committed by foreigners (Noranifitri Md. Nor, Yahaya Ibrahim and Wan Abd. Aziz Wan Mohd Amin, 2015).The same study found that from the findings of focus group interview, it shows that second generation Felda faced social impact caused by foreign workers influx namely economy, social, skill, security, health, education and environment. The influx of foreign workers gives the negative impact such as lack of employment opportunities for the second generation of Felda and rampant crime problem. Problems affecting social welfare second generation in the fulfilling quality of life.

            Prior study conducted by Hamzah Abdul-Rahman, Chen Wang, Lincoln C. Wood and Shu Fung Lowa (2012) found that there are quite a few negative impact of foreign workers such as bad workmanship by the foreign workers as they are low skilled and mostly without basic education. Other than that, local labor become less interest to work in construction industry, slow pace in technology advancement, increment in criminal activity and existence of illegal workers. An extensive use of semi-skilled and unskilled foreign labour will inhibit the use of new technologies within firms since it is much cheaper to engage in labour intensive tasks using older technology. Nonetheless, in certain sectors, mainly construction, plantation and low-end services sectors, foreign labour is crucial since not many local labours are opt to work in these sectors. Therefore, foreign labour is required to sustain these sectors (Rahmah Ismail and Ferayuliani Yuliyusman, 2014).

            In fact, some argued that the influx of foreign workers will only lead to problems in the social, economic and political areas of the importing country because many of those entered illegally (Nasri Bachtiar, Rahmi Fahmy and Rahmah Ismail, 2015). The National Professor Council (2016), made a statement in the press on the foreign workers issue. The president mentioned that high and continuous dependency on foreign workers will reduce productivity in the long run. This is due to lack of initiative from employers to be technologically innovative in their businesses This statement is also supported by Thangavelu (2012), firms utilize less capital and technology intensive investments due to foreign workers influx.

            According to Mohd Na’eim Ajis, Mohamad Faisol Keling, Zaheruddin Othman and Md. Shukri Shu’ib (2014), foreign workers contribute to the poverty in Malaysia due to the economy impact on locals. On top of that, foreign workers also has the possibility to threaten the social aspect of the country, such as health. There are foreign workers who enter the country without going through health check up required, and as a result, they bring along contagious disease.  

            With the uncontrollable entry of foreign workers, eventually it will be a threat to the national security especially in the economy and social context. This phenomenon has also given threat to the amity of the people, when a local worker is forced to compete with a foreign worker to get employed. Prior study by Ramesh Kumar Moona Haji Mohamed, Charles Ramendran SPR, Peter Yacob (2012), supports that numbers of foreign workers are increasing whereby assisting companies to save costs by employed labors in lower scale salary. But, this caused unemployment rate increased among the local workers and thus uncertainty is possible at the same time by increase in such activities like crime, culture and illegal strikes. Besides, it will be a challenge to Malaysia for preparing the nation towards high income country. Malaysia being a multiracial nation has many ethnicities. The presence of foreign workers have now outnumbered one of the ethnicity and this could affect the Malaysia culture as there are many of them. Cultural aspect must be protected before it becomes a culture shock for Malaysians.

2.9 Malaysia Initiatives to curb the foreign workers issues

For decades, Malaysia has been trying to implement various initiatives to overcome the foreign workers issues. Prior studies from the 1970’s up to now have been recommending action plan for the issue. However, from time to time implementation strategies changes. Something that cannot be done before not necessarily means it cannot be done today. Currently, Malaysia has the fund and resources to implement strategies.

            In the 2016 budget, the Prime Minister of Malaysia announced effective from 1 July 2016, the national minimum wage will be increased from RM900 to RM1,000 per month for Peninsular Malaysia and from RM800 to RM920 for Sabah, Sarawak and the Federal Territory of Labuan. The intent is to reduce the burden of the rising cost of living. However, what is the difference between locals and foreign workers? Yes it can help the locals but the frustration is when the locals are treated the same as foreign workers and given the same benefits. 

            According to Rahmah Ismail and Ferayuliani Yuliyusman (2014), Malaysia should encourage local labours to replace jobs held by unskilled foreign labours by offering a better wage scheme, introducing a better working condition and job security for the unattractive sectors like agricultural and security sectors, introducing a more stringent law to prevent the unskilled foreign labours from entering the country and more effective enforcement of the law, for example, more stern punishment and allowing the unskilled to work only in specified sectors where labour shortages exist because of the reluctance of local labours to work in such sectors like agricultural and security sectors.

            World Bank’s (2015) country manager to Malaysia, Faris Hadad-Zervoz stressed that the recommendations have to be complemented by human development policies to create an adequate supply of relevant educated Malaysians who are productive to meet the labour demand not only for 2020 but beyond. This is indeed true as the education system will make a difference in the employment sector. Generally, there is a miss-match between the industry needs, qualification and education. Therefore even low skilled workforce finds it tough to secure a job. One of government initiatives to set up the Skill Development Centre is a good platform. For instance in Negeri Sembilan, the Skill Development Centre works closely with companies to ensure the graduates secure a job as soon as completion of studies. This way it is sure to give priority to locals.

 

2.10 Other countries’ practices to curb the foreign workers issues

In the Middle East, the foreign workers issue was in an alarming state hence the the labour laws enacted in most of the GCC countries stressed that employment should be offered firstly to the national citizens, secondly to the citizens of other GCC states, thirdly to non-Gulf Arabs and only then to other foreigners. That approach was in line with the overall Arab position on the issue (Andrzej Kapiszewski, 2006).

 

On the other hand in Singapore, with the persistence of low-wage workers, negative productivity growth in recent years and the growing discontent among local workers over competition from foreign labour, new policy measures were introduced in the 2013 budget to further tighten the inflow of foreign labour, reinforce the impetus to economic restructuring and quality growth and improve the employment prospects for locals. The new measures involved increases in foreign worker levies to further moderate demand, improve foreign workers’ skill sets and reductions in sectorial foreign worker quotas. Minimum qualifying salaries of higher-skilled employment pass holders were also raised to improve employment prospects and address the issue of displacement of local graduates and older mid-level professionals (Tat and Toh, 2014). In addition to that, Singapore also practices minimum wages to raise the well-being of low wage residents and provide low skilled work to senior citizens who are still capable of working. IAs such, foreign workers are not needed for low skilled work.

            Thailand is another country that welcomes foreign workers to help the economy boost. The government has a Memorandum of Understanding with the employers who seek to bring in foreign workers. In that way, they are able to monitor and track and some incentives are given to the employers who register all foreign workers (Bureau of Public Relations, 2015). The benefit of doing such strategy is employers will be honest and proper inflow of foreign workers into the country rather than trying to bring in illegal foreign workers.

3.0 Discussion

The debate on foreign workers is unstoppable. Many forms of attack from the employers, employees, agencies and public will always be against the government. There is always a need and a limit. In this foreign workers matter, there is a need still despite all the negative issues that have aroused and that we can expect to arise in time to come. This is also partially because of the lack of workforce for the 3D jobs which are dirty, difficult and dangerous. Today, we see foreign workers who are ever willing to do these jobs and locals shun away from doing it. 3D is a term that that is commonly used to describe jobs in industries that can potentially be dirty, dangerous and difficult. In Malaysia, jobs in the construction, plantation, automotive maintenance, cleaning services and other similar vocational occupations fall under the 3D category. Hence the need for foreign workers will exist.

            Noting on all the impacts from the presence of the foreign workers, the dilemma still continues. Many other countries are also struggling and implementing strategies as possible as they could. Within this entire struggle, Japan on the other hand is welcoming foreign workers with new policies that include a pledge to deliver the world’s fastest permanent-residency cards for skilled migrants. So it’s here and there as always. It will be tough to get locals onboard, doing what the foreign workers are doing. And, it will be almost impossible to cut off foreign workers from our workforce because we need them, especially the skilled ones. Microsoft co-founder and chairman Bill Gates once said: “We rely on skilled foreign workers for their math, science and creative abilities as well as their cultural knowledge, which helps when localizing products for world markets.” For countries like Japan who exports almost everything, job opportunities are like mushrooms. So they are able to cope the locals and foreign workers.

            Malaysia government has tried many ways to implement strategies but also to realize that enforcement activities also require an integrated approach among all the agencies involved. Immigration is not the only agency to play its part. Employers especially have a huge part to play too. Learning to think out of the box is important. Cost cutting is not the ultimate aim. It is about giving back to the society. Singapore’s strategy to offer employment to senior citizens is a respectable strategy. It reduces the number of old folks home and provides an active lifestyle for them.

            The Immigration department also has to implement stricter rules and regulations for employers. Proper documentation and application of visa must be consistent and up to date. Immigration should make more visits to industries that largely depend on foreign workers in Malaysia such as construction and manufacturing. Stringent enforcement must be maintained and government should give good support to all agencies involved. 

4.0 Conclusion

Malaysia has a long history of relying relatively heavily on foreign, immigrant workers in both high-skilled and low-skilled occupations. We can’t live with or without them. Foreign workers’ presence has positive and negative impact on Malaysia as a whole. The problems can only be solved if we see it from the root. It’s important for the relevant ministries to tackle this issue before it gets out of our hands. Apart from focusing on the foreign workers, the local workers should be given priority. Jon opportunities should firstly be given to local skilled and unskilled workforce. There is a need to provide more benefits to local than foreign workers. Malaysia should introduce more attractive schemes for locals, provide skilled training and competitive wage structure.

            For future recommendations, the study should explore more on the strategies used by local industries to curb the foreign workers issues. A proper policy should be in place as a guidance to manage the foreign workers. Further studies can include on how to attract locals to join the workforce and the strategies used by other countries.   

References

Melissa Chi. (2015). World Bank: Foreign workers help Malaysians, country scale economic ladder, Malaysian Trade Union Congress
Rahmah Ismail and Ferayuliani Yuliyusman. (2014). Foreign Labour on Malaysian Growth, Journal of Economic Integration, Vol.29 No.4, December 2014, 657~675

Evelyn S. Devadason. (2009). Socio-economic effects of foreign workers on the host economy: the case of the Malaysian manufacturing sector, FEA Working Paper No. 2009-26

Noranifitri Md. Nor, Yahaya Ibrahim and Wan Abd. Aziz Wan Mohd Amin. (2015). A conceptual framework for the social impact assessment of foreign workers influx on the social wellbeing of the second generation Felda, Journal of Human Capital Development, ISSN: 1985-7012 Vol. 8 No. 2

Borhan Sareya, Kasim Mansur and Roslinah Mahmud.  (2015). Immigration and Employment Rate: A Case Study in Oil Palm Sabah Plantation Sector, Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics

Vol. 2, No. 1, 2015, 49 – 61, ISSN 2289-6856 (Print), 2289-8018 (Online)

Nasri Bachtiar, Rahmi Fahmy and Rahmah Ismail. (2015). The Demand for Foreign Workers in the Manufacturing Sector in Malaysia, Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 49(2) 2015 135 - 147

Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz. (2001). Bangladeshi Migrant Workers in Malaysia’s Construction Sector, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, March 2001 Vol. 16, No. 1

Mohd Safri Saiman and Salmie Jemon. (2014). Social Security: Case of Foreign Workers in Sabah, Malaysia, Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, June 2014, 87 – 102, ISSN 2289-6856

Mohd Na’eim Ajis, Mohamad Nasir Saludin, Azman Ismail, Otto F. von Feigenblatt, Md. Shukri Shuib and Mohamad Faisol Keling. (2010). Managing Foreign Workers in Southeast Asian Countries, Journal of Asia Pacific Studies ( 2010) Vol 1, No 3, 481-505

Mohd Na’eim Ajis, Mohamad Faisol Keling, Zaheruddin Othman and Md. Shukri Shu’ib. (2014). The Dilemma of Managing Foreign Workers in Malaysia: Opportunities and Challenges, Global Journal of Human-Social Science: F Political Science, Volume 14 Issue 4 Version 1.0

Hamzah Abdul-Rahman, Chen Wang, Lincoln C. Wood and Shu Fung Lowa. (2012). Negative impact induced by foreign workers: Evidence in Malaysian construction sector, Habitat International 36 (2012) 433e443

Abdallah M Elamin Hayfaa A. Tlaiss , (2015),"Exploring the relationship between organizational
citizenship behavior and organizational justice in the Islamic Saudi Arabian context", Employee
Relations, Vol. 37 Iss 1 pp. 2 – 29

Boudewijn van Straaten. (2011). Organizational Behavior, Worker’s Origin, Continuance Commitment and Intention to Quit, Tilburg University

Wajda Wikhamn and Angela T. Hall, J.D. (2012). Social Exchange in a Swedish Work Environment, International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 23

National Professor Council. (2016). Press Release

Thangavelu, Shandre Mugan. (2012). Economic Growth, Welfare and Foreign Workers: Case of Singapore, International Conference on Trade, Investment and Production Networks in Asia Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy (GEP)

Tat, Hui Weng, Toh, Ruby. (2014). Growth with equity in Singapore: challenges and prospects, International Labour Office, Conditions of Work and Employment Branch. - Geneva: ILO, 2014
Conditions of work and employment series, No.48; ISSN: 2226-8944; 2226-8952

Azizah Kasim. (2005). Cross-Border Movement of Foreign Workers in Malaysia: A Comparative Analysis, Master Builders Association Malaysia

Ramesh Kumar Moona Haji Mohamed, Charles Ramendran SPR, Peter Yacob. (2012). The Impact of Employment of Foreign Workers: Local Employability and Trade Union Roles in Malaysia, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, October 2012, Vol. 2, No. 10, ISSN: 2222-6990

2016 Budget, Ministry of Finance Malaysia

Andrzej Kapiszewski. (2006). United Nations expert group meeting on international migration and development in the Arab region, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat

No comments:

Post a Comment